Analytical Paragraph Model
A strong paragraph does not list techniques. It makes a claim, proves it with a specific visual moment, and explains why that moment matters.
Success criteria
- I can write a claim that answers a question, not just describes a page.
- I can use precise visual evidence, including page and panel.
- I can explain technique, effect, and meaning in the same paragraph.
- I can link my paragraph back to the larger argument.
The shape of a paragraph
| Move | Job | Starter |
|---|---|---|
| Claim | Answers the question with an interpretation. | The text presents [idea] as [interpretation]. |
| Evidence | Points to a specific page, panel, or sequence. | On page ..., panel ..., [description]. |
| Technique | Names the visual or verbal choice. | The [angle / gutter / colour / caption] ... |
| Effect | Explains what the choice does to the reader. | This positions the reader to .... |
| Link | Connects to the text's wider idea or the essay question. | This suggests that ..., reinforcing .... |
Model paragraph
Claim: In The Blue House, the text presents Iris's independence as a performance rather than a settled fact. Evidence: On page 14, panel 2, Iris stands in the doorway while the caseworker remains seated behind a large desk. Technique: The low camera angle and the desk across the lower third of the panel make the caseworker appear institutional and immovable, while Iris is pushed to the edge of the frame. Effect: Although Iris says, "I can look after myself," her hands are outside the panel, so the reader cannot see whether she is steady or trembling. The words claim control, but the composition withholds the visual proof. Link: This suggests that her independence is partly a performance for adults, which prepares the reader for the later scene where she finally asks for help.
Why it works
- The claim is arguable. It does not just say "Iris is independent".
- The evidence is locatable: page 14, panel 2.
- The technique is named precisely: low angle, desk placement, framing.
- The effect is about the reader's understanding, not just the character's feelings.
- The link connects to a later moment, so the paragraph builds an argument.
Weak version
This paragraph names a technique, but it does not explain the relationship between the words and the image, and "sad" is a guess rather than an interpretation. It also does not connect to a larger idea.
Improve it
| Problem | Your revision |
|---|---|
| The claim is a description, not an argument. | |
| The evidence is not specific enough. | |
| The effect is a feeling, not an analysis. | |
| The paragraph does not link to the text's wider idea. |
Write your own
Choose one page from the shared graphic novel. Write one paragraph that answers: How does this page position the reader to understand a character or idea?
| Move | Your notes |
|---|---|
| Claim | |
| Evidence (page/panel) | |
| Technique | |
| Effect | |
| Link |
Checklist
- My claim is arguable and answers the question.
- My evidence includes a page and panel.
- I described what is visible before interpreting it.
- I named a technique and explained its effect.
- I linked to a larger idea or another moment in the text.
- I avoided plot summary and unsupported guesses.
One strong paragraph is better than three vague ones. You will repeat this structure in the analytical essay.