Advertisement Rubric
Year 7 English • Advertisement • Week 5 • 20 marks • Teacher, peer, or self-assessment
Five criteria, four levels. Use the descriptors to identify what is working and what to revise.
Marking summary
| Criterion | Marks |
| 1. Audience and purpose | /4 |
| 2. Message and concept | /4 |
| 3. Visual design | /4 |
| 4. Copy and conventions | /4 |
| 5. Rationale | /4 |
| Total | /20 |
Criterion 1: Audience and purpose
| Level | Descriptor | Marks |
| 4 - Confident | Addresses a specific audience with precise choices. The commercial, social, or civic purpose is immediately clear and consistently supported. | 4 |
| 3 - Capable | Addresses a clear audience. The purpose is mostly clear, with minor choices that do not fully fit. | 3 |
| 2 - Developing | Addresses a broad or inconsistent audience. The purpose is stated but not consistently shown in the design. | 2 |
| 1 - Beginning | Audience is missing or “everyone”. The purpose is unclear. | 1 |
Criterion 2: Message and concept
| Level | Descriptor | Marks |
| 4 - Confident | One memorable, credible message drives every choice. The concept is distinctive and well matched to the audience. | 4 |
| 3 - Capable | A clear message is present and mostly supported. The concept is familiar but effective. | 3 |
| 2 - Developing | The message is vague or crowded. The concept relies on generic claims or decoration. | 2 |
| 1 - Beginning | No clear message. The advertisement is a list of features or unrelated images. | 1 |
Criterion 3: Visual design
| Level | Descriptor | Marks |
| 4 - Confident | Salience, hierarchy, colour, layout, and type are deliberate and coherent. The reading path is easy to follow. The design works at a glance and up close. | 4 |
| 3 - Capable | Most design choices support the message. The reading path is clear, with minor weaknesses in contrast, spacing, or type. | 3 |
| 2 - Developing | Some design choices support the message, but clutter, weak contrast, or inconsistent type interferes with reading. | 2 |
| 1 - Beginning | Design choices are random or unreadable. There is no clear focal point or reading path. | 1 |
Criterion 4: Copy and conventions
| Level | Descriptor | Marks |
| 4 - Confident | Headline, supporting copy, and call to action are precise, credible, and suited to the brand voice. Spelling, punctuation, and grammar are controlled. | 4 |
| 3 - Capable | Copy is clear and mostly polished. The call to action is present. Minor errors do not interfere with meaning. | 3 |
| 2 - Developing | Copy is general or repetitive. The call to action is weak or missing. Errors sometimes interfere with meaning. | 2 |
| 1 - Beginning | Copy is unclear, misleading, or incomplete. Errors make the advertisement hard to read. | 1 |
Criterion 5: Rationale
| Level | Descriptor | Marks |
| 4 - Confident | Explains specific choices and their effects on the audience, using precise terminology. Evaluates a strength and a weakness. References the advertisement accurately. | 4 |
| 3 - Capable | Explains most choices and effects. Uses some precise terminology. Offers a reasonable evaluation. | 3 |
| 2 - Developing | Mostly describes the advertisement rather than explaining effects. Terminology is limited or imprecise. Evaluation is generic. | 2 |
| 1 - Beginning | Summary or personal opinion only. No explanation of audience, technique, or effect. Missing or well under length. | 1 |
Marking guide
| Total | Overall description |
| 17-20 | Confident, controlled, and purposeful. The ad and rationale work together. |
| 13-16 | Capable. Clear audience and message, with some uneven choices. |
| 9-12 | Developing. The idea is present but the design or rationale is inconsistent. |
| 5-8 | Beginning. Limited control of audience, message, or design. |
| Below 5 | Insufficient evidence for Year 7 achievement. |
Peer feedback
Swap advertisements with a partner. Do not give a mark. Give one strength, one question, and one specific suggestion.
| Feedback | Your response |
| One thing that works | |
| One question I have | |
| One specific change to try | |
Student checklist
- I can name my audience and give evidence from my ad.
- I can state my message in one sentence.
- I can name three techniques and explain their effects.
- I can explain my reading path.
- I can explain one strength and one weakness.
- I have credited my images and fonts.
Teacher notes
Use the rubric formatively before the final submission. Students should self-assess against criteria 1 and 5 first.
Do not reward decoration over communication. A simpler ad with a clear message can score higher than a busy one.
If a student uses a real logo or an unlicensed image, record it as a conventions issue and require revision before publishing.
For moderation, compare the ad and the rationale together. A strong rationale cannot rescue an ad that does not communicate.