← Advertisement unit pack

Advertisement Rubric

Year 7 English • Advertisement • Week 5 • 20 marks • Teacher, peer, or self-assessment

Five criteria, four levels. Use the descriptors to identify what is working and what to revise.

Marking summary

CriterionMarks
1. Audience and purpose/4
2. Message and concept/4
3. Visual design/4
4. Copy and conventions/4
5. Rationale/4
Total/20

Criterion 1: Audience and purpose

LevelDescriptorMarks
4 - ConfidentAddresses a specific audience with precise choices. The commercial, social, or civic purpose is immediately clear and consistently supported.4
3 - CapableAddresses a clear audience. The purpose is mostly clear, with minor choices that do not fully fit.3
2 - DevelopingAddresses a broad or inconsistent audience. The purpose is stated but not consistently shown in the design.2
1 - BeginningAudience is missing or “everyone”. The purpose is unclear.1

Criterion 2: Message and concept

LevelDescriptorMarks
4 - ConfidentOne memorable, credible message drives every choice. The concept is distinctive and well matched to the audience.4
3 - CapableA clear message is present and mostly supported. The concept is familiar but effective.3
2 - DevelopingThe message is vague or crowded. The concept relies on generic claims or decoration.2
1 - BeginningNo clear message. The advertisement is a list of features or unrelated images.1

Criterion 3: Visual design

LevelDescriptorMarks
4 - ConfidentSalience, hierarchy, colour, layout, and type are deliberate and coherent. The reading path is easy to follow. The design works at a glance and up close.4
3 - CapableMost design choices support the message. The reading path is clear, with minor weaknesses in contrast, spacing, or type.3
2 - DevelopingSome design choices support the message, but clutter, weak contrast, or inconsistent type interferes with reading.2
1 - BeginningDesign choices are random or unreadable. There is no clear focal point or reading path.1

Criterion 4: Copy and conventions

LevelDescriptorMarks
4 - ConfidentHeadline, supporting copy, and call to action are precise, credible, and suited to the brand voice. Spelling, punctuation, and grammar are controlled.4
3 - CapableCopy is clear and mostly polished. The call to action is present. Minor errors do not interfere with meaning.3
2 - DevelopingCopy is general or repetitive. The call to action is weak or missing. Errors sometimes interfere with meaning.2
1 - BeginningCopy is unclear, misleading, or incomplete. Errors make the advertisement hard to read.1

Criterion 5: Rationale

LevelDescriptorMarks
4 - ConfidentExplains specific choices and their effects on the audience, using precise terminology. Evaluates a strength and a weakness. References the advertisement accurately.4
3 - CapableExplains most choices and effects. Uses some precise terminology. Offers a reasonable evaluation.3
2 - DevelopingMostly describes the advertisement rather than explaining effects. Terminology is limited or imprecise. Evaluation is generic.2
1 - BeginningSummary or personal opinion only. No explanation of audience, technique, or effect. Missing or well under length.1

Marking guide

TotalOverall description
17-20Confident, controlled, and purposeful. The ad and rationale work together.
13-16Capable. Clear audience and message, with some uneven choices.
9-12Developing. The idea is present but the design or rationale is inconsistent.
5-8Beginning. Limited control of audience, message, or design.
Below 5Insufficient evidence for Year 7 achievement.

Peer feedback

Swap advertisements with a partner. Do not give a mark. Give one strength, one question, and one specific suggestion.

FeedbackYour response
One thing that works 
One question I have 
One specific change to try 

Student checklist

Teacher notes

Use the rubric formatively before the final submission. Students should self-assess against criteria 1 and 5 first.

Do not reward decoration over communication. A simpler ad with a clear message can score higher than a busy one.

If a student uses a real logo or an unlicensed image, record it as a conventions issue and require revision before publishing.

For moderation, compare the ad and the rationale together. A strong rationale cannot rescue an ad that does not communicate.