Writing About Poetry
A strong paragraph does four things: it makes a claim, supports it with evidence, explains the effect, and connects the effect to the argument. The order matters less than the connection.
The paragraph engine
| Move | What it does | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Claim | States an arguable idea about the poem. | Shelley's sonnet makes imperial power survive only as an ironic inscription. |
| Evidence | Quotes or describes a specific moment. | The inscription commands “Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!” |
| Analysis | Explains how the language produces an effect. | The imperative collapses into “Nothing beside remains”, so the command is answered by the desert it cannot control. |
| Link | Returns to the argument or opens the next idea. | The poem therefore values art not as a monument to power but as a record of power's failure. |
Model paragraph: Ozymandias
Shelley's Ozymandias makes imperial power survive only as an ironic inscription. The inscription commands “Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!”, but the next sentence, “Nothing beside remains”, answers the command with the desert it cannot control. The sonnet's frame deepens the irony: the reader receives the story from a traveller, who received it from a sculptor's surviving art, so the poem is a chain of retellings rather than a direct monument. The final image of “the lone and level sands” stretching “far away” gives the last word to erosion, not to the king. Shelley therefore treats art as a record of power's failure rather than its triumph: the statue preserves the boast, but preservation is precisely what exposes its emptiness.
Embedding evidence
Integrate short quotations into your sentence. Avoid quotation sandwiches:
| Weak | Stronger |
|---|---|
| Shelley writes: “Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!” This shows that Ozymandias is arrogant. | The command to “despair!” is immediately undercut by “Nothing beside remains”, which makes the king's arrogance depend on a world that has already vanished. |
Analysis verbs
Use verbs that describe what the language does: suggests, exposes, undercuts, intensifies, withholds, transforms, aligns, distances, unsettles, qualifies, echoes. Avoid “shows” every time; it flattens the analysis.
Common pitfalls
| Pitfall | Why it weakens the writing | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Retelling the poem | It tells the reader what happens instead of how the poem works. | Start with a claim about a choice or effect. |
| Device listing | Naming a technique is not analysis. | Say what the technique makes the reader notice, and link it to the claim. |
| Context dump | Biography and history can crowd out the text. | Use one context detail where it explains a specific word or choice. |
| Over-claiming | “Proves” turns an interpretation into a certainty. | Use “suggests”, “implies”, “invites us to”. |
| Quotation without explanation | The reader is left to do the analysis. | Explain every quotation in the same sentence or the next. |
Revision checklist
- My thesis is arguable and specific to the poems.
- Every body paragraph has a claim and evidence.
- Every quotation is explained.
- I have used at least one formal choice (form, metre, stanza, turn).
- My conclusion says something new, not just repeats the introduction.